Ñ§Ï°Íø¿¼ÊÔѧϰ×ÊÁÏ

Gzu521.com

2008¿¼ÑÐÓ¢ÓïÊîÆÚÇ¿»¯°à·­Òë½²Òå-Ó¢ÒëººÈ«ÕæÊÔÌâ¼°Ïê½â(1)

¿¼ÑÐÓ¢Óï   µã»÷£º´Î   ·¢²¼Ê±¼ä£º2007-7-16   ¡¾×ÖÌ壺´ó ÖРС¡¿   À´Ô´£ºÎͼ½ÌÓý
Gzu521.comÎÒµÄÑ§Ï°Íø

µÚÒ»²¿·Ö  Ó¢ÒëººÈ«ÕæÊÔÌâ

  dLSv }v }( OY [ ±¾ ×Ê ÁÏ À´ Ô´ ÓÚ ¹ó ÖÝ Ñ§ ϰ Íø ¿¼ÑÐÒ»·½¿¼ÑÐÓ¢Óï http://Www.gzU521.com ] dLSv }v }( OY

unit 1£¨1994Ä꣩

¡¡¡¡according to the new school of scientists£¬technology is an overlooked force in expanding the horizons of scientific knowledge.£¨71£©science moves forward£¬they say£¬not so much through the insights of great men of genius as BECause of more ordinary things like improved techniques and tools.£¨72£©¡°in short¡±£¬a leader of the new school contends£¬¡°the scientific revolution£¬as we call it£¬was largely the improvement and invention and use of a series of instruments that expanded the reach of science in innumerable directions.¡±

¡¡¡¡£¨73£©over the years£¬tools and technology themselves as a source of fundamental innovation have largely been ignored by historians and philosophers of science. the modern school that hails technology argues that such masters as galileo£¬newton£¬maxwell£¬einstein£¬and inventors such as edison attached great importance to£¬and derived great benefit from£¬craft information and technological devices of different kinds that were usable in scientific experiments.

¡¡¡¡the centerpiece of the argument of a technology-yes£¬genius-no advocate was an analysis of galileo¡¯s role at the start of the scientific revolution. the wisdom of the day was derived from ptolemy£¬an astronomer of the second century£¬whose elaborate system of the sky put earth at the center of all heavenly motions.£¨74£©galileo¡¯s greatest glory was that in 1609 he was the first person to turn the newly invented telescope on the heavens to prove that the planets revolve around the SUN rather than around the earth. but the real hero of the story£¬according to the new school of scientists£¬was the long evolution in the improvement of machinery for making eyeglasses.

federal policy is necessarily involved in the technology vs. genius dispute.£¨75£©whether the government should increase the financing of pure science at the expense of technology or vice versa£¨·´Ö®£©often depends on the issue of which is seen as the driving force.

 

 

 

 

 

unit 1¡¡¡¡·­ÒëÌâ½â£º

¡¡71£© science moves forward, they say, not so much through the insights of great men of genius as because of more ordinary things like improved techniques and tool.¡¡¡¡

¾ä×Ó·ÖÎö£º¡¡¡¡

µÚÒ»¡¢¾ä×Ó¿ÉÒÔ²ð·ÖΪÈý¶Î£º

science moves forward, they say, / not so much through the insights of great men of genius / as because of more ordinary things like improved techniques and tool.¡¡¡¡

µÚ¶þ¡¢¾ä×ÓÖ÷¸É½á¹¹ÊÇ£º

1£®not so much through... as because of...ÓëÆä¡­¡­µ¹²»Èç¡­¡­¡¡¡¡

2£®ÒòΪnot so much... asÊǸö²¢Áнṹ£¬Ò²¾ÍÊÇ˵soºÍasºóÃæÓ¦¸ÃÁ½¸ö´ÊµÄÒâ˼Ӧ¸ÃÏàͬ£¬ËùÒÔ¶àÒå½é´ÊthroughµÄÒâ˼Ӧ¸ÃµÈÓÚbecause ofÒòΪ£¬ÓÉÓÚ¡£¡¡¡¡

µÚÈý¡¢´ÊµÄ´¦Àí£º¡¡¡¡8FUPa?,&o)uqMp:[ ´ËÎÄתÌùÓÚÎÒµÄÑ§Ï°Íø¿¼ÑÐÒ»·½¿¼ÑÐÓ¢Óï http://www.Gzu521.com]8FUPa?,&o)uqMp:

1£®the insights of great men of geniusÊǺóÃæ´ø¶¨ÓïµÄÃû´Ê¶ÌÓï½á¹¹£¬ºóÖö¨ÓïµÄ˳ÐòÓ¦¸ÃÔÚººÓï·­ÒëÖÐÓ¦¸Ãµ¹¹ýÀ´£¬¼´´ÓºóÍùǰ·­ÒëΪ£ºÌì²ÅΰÈ˵ÄÕæÖª×Æ¼û¡£¡¡¡¡

2£®more ordinary things like improved techniques and toolÕâÊǽṹÊǽé´Êlike¶ÌÓï×ö¶¨ÓïÐÞÊÎÖÐÐÄ´Êmore ordinary things£¬Ò²ÊÇÏÈ·­Ò붨ÓÔÙ·­ÒëÖÐÐÄ´Ê£ºÏñ¸Ä½øÁ˵ļ¼ÊõºÍ¹¤¾ßµÈ¸üΪÆÕͨµÄ¶«Î÷¡£¡¡¡¡

3£®they say²åÈëÓ°´ÕÕººÓïϰ¹ß£¬·­Òëʱ·ÅÔÚ¾äÊס£¡¡¡¡

ÍêÕûµÄÒëÎÄ£º¡¡¡¡

71£©ËûÃÇ˵£¬¿ÆÑ§µÄ·¢Õ¹ÓëÆä˵ԴÓÚÌì²ÅΰÈ˵ÄÕæÖª×Æ¼û£¬²»Èç˵ԴÓڸĽøÁ˵ļ¼ÊõºÍ¹¤¾ßµÈ¸üΪÆÕͨµÄ¶«Î÷¡£

¡¡¡¡72£© in short, a leader of the new school contends, the scientific revolution, as we call it, was largely the improvement and invention and use of a series of instruments that expanded the reach of science in innumerable direction.¡¡¡¡

¾ä×Ó·ÖÎö£º¡¡¡¡

µÚÒ»¡¢¾ä×Ó¿ÉÒÔ²ð·ÖΪÈý¶Î£º

in short, a leader of the new school contends, the scientific revolution, as we call it, / was largely the improvement and invention and use of a series of instruments / that expanded the reach of science in innumerable direction.

µÚ¶þ¡¢¾ä×ÓÖ÷¸É½á¹¹ÊÇ£º¡¡¡¡

1£©Ïµ±í½á¹¹£ºthe scientific revolution... was largely...¡¡¡¡

2£© thatÒýµ¼µÄ¶¨Óï´Ó¾ä£¬ÏÈÐдÊÊÇthe improvement and invention and use of a series of instruments¡¡¡¡

µÚÈý¡¢´ÊµÄ´¦Àí£º¡¡¡¡

1£®in short ¼ò¶øÑÔÖ®¡¡¡¡

2£®the improvement and invention and use of a series of instruments £¨´ÊÐÔת»»£©Ò»ÏµÁÐÆ÷¾ßµÄ¸Ä½ø¡¢·¢Ã÷ºÍʹÓá¡¡¡

3£®expanded the reach of science in innumerable direction Ö±Ò룺ÔÚÄÑÒÔ¼ÆÊýµÄ·½ÏòÀ©´óÁË¿ÆÑ§µÄ·¶Î§¡¡¡¡

ÍêÕûµÄÒëÎÄ£º¡¡¡¡

72£©ÐÂѧÅɵÄһλÁìÐäÈËÎï¼á³Ö˵£º¼ò¶øÑÔÖ®£¬ÎÒÃÇËùνµÄ¿ÆÑ§¸ïÃü£¬Ö÷ÒªÊÇָһϵÁÐÆ÷¾ßµÄ¸Ä½ø¡¢·¢Ã÷ºÍʹÓ㬶øÕâЩ¸Ä½ø¡¢·¢Ã÷ºÍʹÓÃʹ¿ÆÑ§·¢Õ¹ÎÞËù²»¼°¡£

¡¡¡¡73£© over the years, tools and technology themselves as a source of fundamental innovation have largely been ignored by historians and philosophers of science.¡¡¡¡

¾ä×Ó·ÖÎö£º¡¡¡¡

µÚÒ»¡¢¾ä×Ó¿ÉÒÔ²ð·ÖΪÈý¶Î£º

over the years, tools and technology themselves as a source of fundamental innovation / have largely been ignored / by historians and philosophers of science.¡¡¡¡

µÚ¶þ¡¢¾ä×ÓÖ÷¸É½á¹¹ÊÇÒ»¸ö¼òµ¥µÄ±»¶¯Óï̬¾ä£º

1£®tools and technology...have largely been ignored by ...Ö÷Óﲿ·ÖÓÐÒ»¸öthemselves·´Éí´ú´Ê¡¡¡¡

2£®as a source of fundamental innovation½é´Ê¶ÌÓï×ö¶¨Óï¡¡¡¡

µÚÈý¡¢´ÊµÄ´¦Àí£º¡¡¡¡

over the years ¶àÄêÀ´£»philosophers of science ¿ÆÑ§Ë¼Ïë¼ÒÃÇ¡¡¡¡

ÍêÕûµÄÒëÎÄ£º¡¡¡¡

73£©¹¤¾ßºÍ¼¼Êõ±¾Éí×÷Ϊ¸ù±¾ÐÔ´´ÐµÄԴȪ¶àÄêÀ´Ôںܴó³Ì¶ÈÉϱ»Àúʷѧ¼ÒºÍ¿ÆÑ§Ë¼Ïë¼ÒÃǺöÊÓÁË¡£

¡¡¡¡74£© galileo¡¯s greatest glory was that in 1609 he was the first person to turn the newly invented telescope on the heavens to prove that the planets revolve around the sun rather than around the earth.¡¡¡¡

¾ä×Ó·ÖÎö£º¡¡¡¡

µÚÒ»¡¢¾ä×Ó¿ÉÒÔ²ð·ÖΪÈý¶Î£º

galileo¡¯s greatest glory was / that in 1609 he was the first person to turn the newly invented telescope on the heavens / to prove that the planets revolve around the sun rather than around the earth.¡¡sW\/'!fz)X|7O€x l[±¾_ÎÄ_À´_Ô´_ÓÚ_ÎÒ_µÄ_ѧ_ϰ_Íø¿¼ÑÐÒ»·½¿¼ÑÐÓ¢Óï http://Www.GZU521.Com ]sW\/'!fz)X|7O€x l

µÚ¶þ¡¢¾ä×ÓÖ÷¸É½á¹¹ÊÇ£º¡¡¡¡

1£©Ïµ±í½á¹¹galileo¡¯s greatest glory was that...¡¡¡¡

2£©²»¶¨Ê½¶ÌÓï×÷¶¨Óï½á¹¹the first person to turn...¡¡¡¡

3£©¶¯´Ê+±öÓï´Ó¾ä×÷Ä¿µÄ×´Óïto prove that...¡¡¡¡

µÚÈý¡¢´ÊµÄ´¦Àí£º¡¡¡¡

turn the newly invented telescope on the heavens £¨½é´ÊonÒë³É¶¯´Ê£©°Ñз¢Ã÷µÄÍûÔ¶¾µ¶Ô×¼Ìì¿Õ£»rather than ¶ø²»ÊÇ

ÍêÕûµÄÒëÎÄ£º¡¡¡¡

74£©Ù¤ÀûÂÔµÄ×î¹â»ÔÒµ¼¨ÔÚÓÚËûÔÚ1609ÄêµÚÒ»¸ö°Ñз¢Ã÷µÄÍûÔ¶¾µ¶Ô×¼Ìì¿Õ£¬ÒÔ֤ʵÐÐÐÇÊÇÎ§ÈÆÌ«ÑôÐýת¶ø²»ÊÇÎ§ÈÆµØÇòÐýתµÄ¡£¡¡

¡¡75£© whether the government should increase the financing of pure science at the expense of technology or vice versa often depends on the issue of which is seen as the driving force.¡¡

¾ä×Ó·ÖÎö£º¡¡¡¡

µÚÒ»¡¢¾ä×Ó¿ÉÒÔ²ð·ÖΪÈý¶Î£º

whether the government should increase the financing of pure science at the expense of technology or vice versa / often depends on the issue / of which is seen as the driving force.¡¡¡¡

µÚ¶þ¡¢¾ä×ÓÖ÷¸É½á¹¹ÊÇ£º¡¡¡¡

1£©±íʾѡÔñÒâ˼µÄ´Ó¾äwhether the government ...or ...¾¿¾¹ÊÇ¡­¡­»¹ÊÇ¡­¡­×÷¾ä×ÓµÄÖ÷ÓνÓïºÍ±öÓïÊÇdepends on the issue¡¡¡¡

2£©of whichÊDZöÓïthe issueµÄ¶¨Óï´Ó¾ä¡£¡¡¡¡

µÚÈý¡¢´ÊµÄ´¦Àí£º¡¡¡¡

increase the financing of pure science Ôö¼Ó¶Ô´¿ÀíÂÛ¿ÆÑ§µÄ¾­·ÑͶÈ룻at the expense of technology ¼õÉÙ¶Ô¼¼Êõ¾­·ÑµÄͶÈ룻the driving force ¶¯Á¦£¬Çý¶¯Á¦Á¿¡¡¡¡

ÍêÕûµÄÒëÎÄ£º¡¡¡¡

75£©Õþ¸®¾¿¾¹ÊÇÒÔ¼õÉÙ¶Ô¼¼Êõ¾­·ÑµÄͶÈëÀ´Ôö¼Ó¶Ô´¿ÀíÂÛ¿ÆÑ§µÄ¾­·ÑͶÈ룬»¹ÊÇÏà·´£¬ÕâÍùÍùÈ¡¾öÓÚ°ÑÄÄÒ»·½¿´×÷ÊÇÇý¶¯Á¦Á¿¡£

ÏÂ Ò» Ò³
±¾ÎĹ²14Ò³: µÚ [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12] [13] [14] Ò³

ÔðÈα༭£ºgzu521

¿¼ÑÐÒ»·½·ÖÀà
¿¼ÑÐÐÅÏ¢
¿¼Ñи´Ï°
¿¼ÑÐÓ¢Óï
¿¼ÑÐÊýѧ
¿¼ÑÐÕþÖÎ
¿¼ÑÐרҵ¿Î
MBA/EMBA/MPA
ͬµÈѧÀú/ÔÚְ˶ʿ
·¨ÂÉ˶ʿ
»á¼ÆË¶Ê¿
¹¤³Ì˶ʿ
½ÌÓý˶ʿ
·ÖÀàÍÆ¼öÐÅÏ¢
¸ü¶à...
´óÀà×îÐÂÎÄÕÂ
¸ü¶à...